Re: DFG's definition of "take"

[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ California Scuba Diving BBS ] [ FAQ ]

Posted by Dave on June 09, 2005 at 21:40:32:

In Reply to: DFG's definition of "take" posted by Chuck Tribolet on June 09, 2005 at 19:16:37:

Good research Chuck.

That has to be an unconstitutially vague definition. Using it at face value, "pursuing" a Black Sea Bass to photograph it is "taking" a protected species.....

Follow Ups:

Re: DFG's definition of "take" Elaine 22:12:59 06/09/05 (16)
- Agreed North Coast Diver 13:06:05 06/11/05 (0)
- Re: DFG's definition of "take" Dave 07:56:31 06/10/05 (14)
  - The F&G Regs have nothing to do with photography. Elaine 12:12:20 06/12/05 (4)
    - Re: The F&G Regs have nothing to do with photography. Dave 15:13:42 06/12/05 (3)
      - It works the other way too Elaine 17:06:45 06/12/05 (0)
      - Then why do you go there? Elaine 16:55:40 06/12/05 (1)
        
        Re: Then why do you go there? Dave 21:55:47 06/12/05 (0)
  - You are absurd WestCoastDiver 09:51:37 06/10/05 (8)
    - Re: You are an ignorant ass Dave 18:32:02 06/10/05 (7)
      - "Dave", do you dive? Derek 20:08:13 06/10/05 (6)
        
        Re: "Dave", do you dive? East Coast Diver 20:16:49 06/10/05 (5)
        
        Re: "Dave", do you dive? bt5325 21:05:12 06/10/05 (4)
        
        "Dave", people think you are a complete idiot Derek 14:19:38 06/11/05 (3)
        
        Must not be obvious! Dave 17:12:31 06/11/05 (2)
        
        Re: Must not be obvious! EastCoastDiver 18:01:28 06/11/05 (1)
        
        Re: Must not be obvious! Dave 20:07:57 06/11/05 (0)

Post a Followup