Re: long point??!!

Posted by Max Bottomtime on August 26, 1999 at 17:45:11:

In Reply to: long point??!! posted by taz on August 26, 1999 at 02:33:42:

The kelp has returned, however I still consider Long Point to be a baby-dive site. Still, there are things to see from 5' to over 150', though the sand takes over off the point at about 100'.

Follow Ups:

• Hold on, you're Max Bottomtime, not Max Depth ;-) Eins 23:36:24 8/27/99 (7)
  • Re: Hold on, you're Max Bottomtime, not Max Depth ;-) Max Bottomtime 11:01:00 8/28/99 (6)
    • What's at 218'? His personal record, or a mermaid? [-] Eins 12:35:15 8/28/99 (5)
      • Re: What's at 218'? His personal record, or a mermaid? [-] Max Bottomtime 14:10:18 8/28/99 (4)
        • Re: What's at 218'? His personal record, or a mermaid? [-] MHK 20:00:17 8/30/99 (3)
          • Re: What's at 218'? His personal record, or a mermaid? [-] John Walker 02:33:41 8/31/99 (2)
            • Re: What's at 218'? His personal record, or a mermaid? [-] MHK 18:28:55 8/31/99 (1)
              • Re: What's at 218'? His personal record, or a mermaid? [-] John Walker 21:29:46 8/31/99 (0)

Post a Followup