While that study may be plausible, here's an account of folks who +

Posted by mike on May 06, 2001 at 20:24:58:

In Reply to: Re: Deep air and the helium effect posted by Steve on May 06, 2001 at 10:52:41:

thought they wouldn't be narked.

i posted this link a few months ago but once again, it is relevant, so i'll post it again;
http://www.divernet.com/technique/10000narked.htm

disregarding all that "extended range" training program stuff, it is most interesting to note the behavior of the divers...total CF...

Follow Ups:

• Good article with some good points in it RaiderKarl 10:17:37 05/07/01 (10)
  • Re: Good article with some good points in it Jeff B 11:14:50 05/07/01 (9)
    • There are different degrees of "careful" RaiderKarl 08:59:07 05/08/01 (8)
      • Re: There are different degrees of "careful" Jeff B 11:15:47 05/08/01 (7)
        • The Last Dive RaiderKarl 12:16:05 05/08/01 (6)
          • Re: The Last Dive Jeff B 15:20:10 05/08/01 (2)
            • 300 feet on air RaiderKarl 16:23:47 05/08/01 (1)
              • "Nothing is wrong with diving deep on air" Wrong, wrong, wrong!! AADIVER 23:38:55 05/08/01 (0)
          • not to flame or anything but.. mike 12:41:33 05/08/01 (2)
            • i agree that the limit is transient RaiderKarl 13:41:15 05/08/01 (1)
              • Re: i agree that the limit is transient Jeff B 15:22:52 05/08/01 (0)

Post a Followup