since GUE agrees with you already ...

Posted by CalAbDiver on July 11, 2001 at 17:21:19:

In Reply to: Re: johnny come lately posted by MHK on July 11, 2001 at 17:04:34:

i cant think of anyone on this earth who would disagree with you on this point about 165 fsw (air). the more salient question is 'why is PADI insisting on an extended range on air class when TDI and GUE have abandoned that concept already?'

i see it more of a current events issue than an overall safety issue. it has been done in the past, but it is no longer in vogue.

Follow Ups:

• TDI abandoned extended range? Bill Johnson 08:57:58 07/12/01 (6)
  • its no longer a pre-req CalAbDiver 10:27:12 07/12/01 (5)
    • Not True Exactly Bill Johnson 11:54:25 07/12/01 (4)
      • nothing on earth is "exactly" true CalAbDiver 11:58:09 07/12/01 (3)
        • Re: nothing on earth is "exactly" true Jeff B 20:35:53 07/12/01 (0)
        • I should have titled my last post without the word "exactly" Bill Johnson 12:22:46 07/12/01 (1)
          • agreed CalAbDiver 13:07:28 07/12/01 (0)
• Re: since GUE agrees with you already ... MHK 17:26:24 07/11/01 (1)
  • i admire your candor Mike CalAbDiver 17:38:01 07/11/01 (0)

Post a Followup