Posted by sehunt on July 22, 2001 at 19:35:23:
In Reply to: ??????????????? posted by msblucow on July 22, 2001 at 18:06:26:
I'm not positive what each '?' refers to, but...
That particular post says that I said
>Seahunt has, once again, introduced the theory that we have failed
>to adequately explained to address the issue
You will notice that it is not in response to a post of mine, it is a starting thread. I never did what he says. I think he did it for a particular reason, but why is sort of irrelevant. I think it is clearly a calculated lie. It irritates me. It is just one of many from the past week. At the end of this post, I will put my post to ff that offers a list of these and their URLs, from the past week, including an URL where I tried to get us back to the truce we have had until just recently (demo time?)
Now, if these are not lies, please correct me and show where I posted what he claims I said. I think you owe me an answer.
Let me clarify something.
This is not an inditment of MHK. This is an inditment of all board memebers that have watched the events of the past year and not protested.
As for his dishonesty, may I offer just a few recent statements from his posts. Please clarify if you think these are accurate representations of the truth. The titles and times are included.
In another post from yesterday.....
Re: Explanation of *on the fly computing* - LONG
Posted by MHK on July 19, 2001 at 17:24:00:
In Reply to: Re: Explanation of *on the fly computing* - LONG posted by SLANG on July 19, 2001 at 17:08:51:
....... diver's and why was Seahunt screaming so loudly that it can't be done????
While this is not literally dishonest, maybe he should have mentioned that I haven't questioned anything about his deco methods since the Demo (what, 5 months ago)....except to confirm that he had a method that was based on depth averaging and to ask how he does the averging.
Actually, looking at the first recent post on the deco topic (whick I still say was just posted to generate publicity for the weekends demo), I notice that in the starting post of the thread, there is this...
NDL limits without using a computer...
Posted by MHK on July 18, 2001 at 13:39:53:
Seahunt has, once again, introduced the theory that we have failed to adequately explained to address the issue. Despite numerous posts, countless explanations he doesn't get it.. I'll try one more time to demonstrate how VERY easily this can be done..
That's definately dishonest. I did not 'once again' say anything about DIR deco methods. I didn't say anything about them. That was posted out of the blue to generate controversy. There is nothing about deco from me preceeding this post. You mention instigation.
In a post from the day before that...
Re: No No No....
Posted by MHK on July 18, 2001 at 11:43:20:
In Reply to: Re: No No No.... posted by seahunt on July 18, 2001 at 11:33:48:
BTW, Will we see you this weekend at Casino Point and maybe you can
tell Irvine exactly why DIR doesn't apply out here, how we can't dive
without computers, why the helicopter gyro thing is better and so
I never said DIR does not apply out here.
I never said that anyone can't dive without computers.
As I have made clear before by showing the original post, his favorite statements about 'the helicopter gyro thing' is a complete willful mis-representation of what I said (also partly made up)... and he does love to repeat it, doesn't he.
The original post is at http://diver.net/bbs/messages/11822.shtml:
And how many times did he claim that I advised a newbie on how to dive the Moody? I clearly explained that I never did and I never even responded to the newbie... yet he still kept repeating it.
By the way Frank, wasn't it you that posted that choice selection from George Irving??? ...
As the BBS Turns fix - From George Irvine III:
Posted by AADIVER on July 03, 2001 at 08:41:44:
In Reply to: Paging Mr. Firewalker, I need my As the BBS Turns fix, please (nt) posted by Kevin on July 03, 2001 at 08:19:18:
Definately fascinating reading.
If anyone wants to tell me how provocative I am, please look at this URL... One of the last times I tried to de-escalate this arguement.
There are plenty of other cases. I can post the URLs if anyone wants, but it really doesn't matter. All minds are made up already. MHK can say what he wants. I can post the quotes and URL's to prove what I say... but it has all been done before. My post was just a protest in the wind. I've done that before. Usually, people don't openly agree with what I say, at least not for a couple of years, but I say what I say and I stick by it. Say what you want, but what about what you know inside? What does it say? That is what we all have to answer to. I'm used to it and so get outraged by lies, because they always come back.
Post a Followup