Re: What's wrong with 104's?



[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ California Scuba Diving BBS ] [ FAQ ]

Posted by Steve on August 16, 2002 at 13:27:20:

In Reply to: Re: What's wrong with 104's? posted by Kendall Raine on August 16, 2002 at 09:32:38:


"Steve, you seem to have returned to the indignant, truculent, snotty tone of yore: "Is six reasons anough for you?". From the content of your post, it seems you haven't learned much about diving (or grammar) since the last time you tried that attitude, either. "

Kendall, where in my post did I write "anough"? My six reasons are valid to me.

Kendall wrote:

"For the Moody, I could do two 30 minute dives with 20/30 and have lots of gas left over without having to blowback."

This is nonsense because you would rather wear this huge heavy doubles setup that has much more drag than the *optimal* gear.

It seems you would rather go on the attack then debate the reasons. As far as you thinking.

"Steve, you seem to have returned to the indignant, truculent, snotty tone of yore: "

GFYS

Steve



Follow Ups:



Post a Followup

Name:
E-Mail:

Subject:

Comments:


[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ California Scuba Diving BBS ] [ FAQ ]