Posted by Chris on May 23, 2003 at 10:16:18:
In Reply to: Jim, you miss the point! posted by Chris on May 23, 2003 at 10:11:13:
In fact it should not matter who is at fault.
Tim's defence should be covered (at least 50% if not alll) by the DM's insurance. That is the meaning of additionally insured.
Did you ask IMS why they will not allow the boat to be named as additionally insured?