Posted by Chris on May 23, 2003 at 10:16:18:
In Reply to: Jim, you miss the point! posted by Chris on May 23, 2003 at 10:11:13:
In fact it should not matter who is at fault.
Tim's defence should be covered (at least 50% if not alll) by the DM's insurance. That is the meaning of additionally insured.
Did you ask IMS why they will not allow the boat to be named as additionally insured?
Post a Followup