|What about Section 103 violations????|
Posted by Ken Kurtis on November 16, 2005 at 17:31:19:|
In Reply to: Bright side: Keeps DAN Funded, our chambers open, and practice for chamber staff! posted by Walt on November 16, 2005 at 17:05:11:
I wonder how many boats are in compliance with this section of the ordinance?
"Sec. 103. Vessels Used for Scuba Diving in Open Water. A person shall not operate a vessel for hire as a base of operation for scuba diving unless the vessel is operated and equipped in the manner specified by Article VI of this Ordinance and the operator has submitted a letter of compliance to the Director."
That's a $500 fine per violation, which would probably trablsate into per trip.
Seriously, this provision, along with the one requiring a grand total of TWO scuba dives for certification (which was the national standard 31 years ago), sorely indicates that an ordinance written in 1974 might be a little out of date with the realities of diving in 2005.
Anyone want to push for an update????
|Optional Link URL:|
|Optional Link Title:|
|Optional Image URL:|
|Post Background Color:||White Black|
|Post Area Page Width:||Normal Full|
|You must type in the
scrambled text key to
This is required to
help prevent spam bots
from flooding this BBS.