In Reply to: reasons why GUE is un-sat posted by North Coast Diver on January 20, 2006 at 19:13:26:

So what you are saying is that because of the way GUE divers are trained is the reason why that DAN is having a hard time financially? I do not agree. If what you say is true, should the rest of the diving community be angry with GUE possible causing an increased premium cost to its paying members? As a former actuary I see it this way; I see reported statistical numbers of many more divers per year that are trained by many other agencies getting bent and require being treated for DCS. I would tend to believe that number is much higher than divers trained by GUE. Given that premise, should they be viewed in the same regard as you hold GUE? One more question, when you say un-sat does that mean unsatisfactory or something else?