|Re: Follow-up: Ruling|
Posted by Second Fiddle on December 23, 2008 at 09:11:06:|
In Reply to: Follow-up: Ruling posted by Walt on December 22, 2008 at 17:56:17:
I'm not sure anything is really any different. The RULE as I always understood it was "Do No Harm". The little I have read about the case indicated that the individual was pulled from the car like a "rag doll". Unless the car was likely to explode then the responder did NOT meet the level of care - Do No Harm.
Don't get me wrong - I generally do NOT agree with the radical liberal interpetations coming from the California courts - I'm just not sure this case really changed anything.
That said - my position would be just to call 911 and stay clear. However, if the person is truely in grave danger I suspect that my compassion might override my concern for my future financial well-being.
|Optional Link URL:|
|Optional Link Title:|
|Optional Image URL:|
|Post Background Color:||White Black|
|Post Area Page Width:||Normal Full|
|You must type in the
scrambled text key to
This is required to
help prevent spam bots
from flooding this BBS.