diver.net |
Re: If the search had started at Eureka . . . |
Posted by Thalassamania on October 24, 2010 at 23:31:53: In Reply to: If the search had started at Eureka . . . posted by Ken Kurtis on October 24, 2010 at 21:09:15:
Ken's logic is impeccable (as usual), but he is assuming that the only breach of duty were the lousy head counts. I would differ, and respectfully submit that the first breach of duty occurred when the diver surfaced, blew a whistle and waived and was not seen by anyone one the boat. In a heavy current should not a competent lookout have been posted specifically watching downstream? The missed head count just made it worse and made the boat appear even less competent to the jury.
|
Follow Ups:
|
Name: | |
---|---|
E-Mail: | |
Subject: | |
Message: | |
Optional Link URL: | |
Optional Link Title: | |
Optional Image URL: | |
Post Background Color: | White Black |
Post Area Page Width: | Normal Full |
You must type in the scrambled text key to the right. This is required to help prevent spam bots from flooding this BBS. |
|
Text Key: |