|Re: If the search had started at Eureka . . .|
Posted by Thalassamania on October 24, 2010 at 23:31:53:|
In Reply to: If the search had started at Eureka . . . posted by Ken Kurtis on October 24, 2010 at 21:09:15:
Ken's logic is impeccable (as usual), but he is assuming that the only breach of duty were the lousy head counts. I would differ, and respectfully submit that the first breach of duty occurred when the diver surfaced, blew a whistle and waived and was not seen by anyone one the boat. In a heavy current should not a competent lookout have been posted specifically watching downstream? The missed head count just made it worse and made the boat appear even less competent to the jury.
|Optional Link URL:|
|Optional Link Title:|
|Optional Image URL:|
|Post Background Color:||White Black|
|Post Area Page Width:||Normal Full|
|You must type in the
scrambled text key to
This is required to
help prevent spam bots
from flooding this BBS.