Finally, a straight response

[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ California Scuba Diving BBS ] [ FAQ ]

Posted by seahunt on May 03, 2001 at 17:43:43:

In Reply to: Re: Make it a 100 HP ... posted by MHK on May 03, 2001 at 17:07:00:

Very good!!! A real response! I mean it.

>What part of AVERAGING YOUR DEPTHS didn't you understand????
That was the part I figured out. There had better be more than that to it though.
My questions, never answered after the demo, is do you use a recording depth
guage to do it... and do you then plug the value into a surface computer for

And while I have avoided mentioning your deco methods much since I figured
out that you actually had one, if you are not using a recording depth guage,
how do you verify your accuracy in the first place, during learning and later

Those are 3 of the 5 questions I posted after the demo. I would still like
an answer.
Thanx, seahunt
PS. Not to start a fight in any way, but depth averaging seems more about
gas laws (which are linear and relatively simple), not about deco method
calculations, which are not. That is the only reason why I give some
credibility to your methods, but It was sure hard to get out of you and
I still question its accuracy to some degree, but not completely. Not
enough to pick on you anyway and you may have noticed that I haven't since
the demo. Terry was the one that finally said that. I still can't figure
out why I had to go to the demo to find that out.

Follow Ups:

Post a Followup




[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ California Scuba Diving BBS ] [ FAQ ]