Posted by seahunt on July 23, 2001 at 06:43:09:
In Reply to: Lets tell it the way it is. posted by seahunt on July 20, 2001 at 20:15:30:
Just so oyu don't have to look around much to find what I am talking about, here are a couple sample dishonest posts from the past week. if they are true, I'm sure someone can easily offer up the URLs of the posts where I said these things that MHK claims I said. The titles and times of his posts are included.
In another post from yesterday.....
Re: Explanation of *on the fly computing* - LONG
Posted by MHK on July 19, 2001 at 17:24:00:
In Reply to: Re: Explanation of *on the fly computing* - LONG posted by SLANG on July 19, 2001 at 17:08:51:
....... diver's and why was Seahunt screaming so loudly that it can't be done????
While this is not literally dishonest, maybe he should have mentioned that I haven't questioned anything about his deco methods since the Demo (what, 5 months ago)....except to confirm that he had a method that was based on depth averaging and to ask how he does the averging.
Actually, looking at the first recent post on the deco topic (whick I still say was just posted to generate publicity for the weekends demo), I notice that in the starting post of the thread, there is this...
NDL limits without using a computer...
Posted by MHK on July 18, 2001 at 13:39:53:
Seahunt has, once again, introduced the theory that we have failed to adequately explained to address the issue. Despite numerous posts, countless explanations he doesn't get it.. I'll try one more time to demonstrate how VERY easily this can be done..
That's definately dishonest. I did not 'once again' say anything about DIR deco methods. I didn't say anything about them. That was posted out of the blue to generate controversy. There is nothing about deco from me preceeding this post. You mention instigation.
In a post from the day before that...
Re: No No No....
Posted by MHK on July 18, 2001 at 11:43:20:
In Reply to: Re: No No No.... posted by seahunt on July 18, 2001 at 11:33:48:
BTW, Will we see you this weekend at Casino Point and maybe you can
tell Irvine exactly why DIR doesn't apply out here, how we can't dive
without computers, why the helicopter gyro thing is better and so
I never said DIR does not apply out here.
I never said that anyone can't dive without computers.
As I have made clear before by showing the original post, his favorite statements about 'the helicopter gyro thing' is a complete willful mis-representation of what I said (also partly made up)... and he does love to repeat it, doesn't he.
The original post is at http://diver.net/bbs/messages/11822.shtml:
If anyone wants to tell me how provocative I am, please look at this URL... One of the last times I tried to de-escalate this arguement.
If these aren't lies, I'd like to know how.
Post a Followup