Posted by seahunt on July 27, 2001 at 13:26:16:
In Reply to: Re: Uh. You don't want a truce? posted by MHK on July 26, 2001 at 16:28:54:
Why is it that every time I give you a straight answer, you ignore it?
There are times and places for safety as well as times and places for
fun.
*
Now let me get this straight. I should apologise for when I posted my
documention of the posts where you lied about me, but you have no need
to apologise for the lies.
You complain about the timing of my post, but since your posts seemed
to be timed to generate publicity for the demo, it's not surprising that
my post was just before the demo. Really though, you've come to bore me
so much and I'm so used to your lying, that I really didn't much notice
until a while after you posted. As it turned out, I don't think it
mattered any. No matter how much time you had, you never refuted any of
my documentations of the lies you posted. I sure hope you don't consider
any of those responces appropriate. I'd say your responces are an
interesting selection.
You say your position is simple. So was mine. Where did I post what
you claimed ... any of your 5 lies of the week?
You want anyone to come clean. Why don't you admit to your lies that
I carefully documented?
***
Actually, that is part of what I meant to AADiver. Originally, I tried
to respond to you with your aggressive tactics, but since you hide
behind the board, there is no consequence to your lies and you have no
shame. I then went to a strategy of completely avoiding your tactics.
They are no longer natural to me.
You see Michael, you annoyed me and that means I focused my attention
on you. You can't know what that means, but a result is that I know you
very well. I know your weaknesses too. You are dishonest and that can be
easily dealt with using honesty. That's what I did. The unfortunate
thing is that I don't believe you can be honest for long in any case. A
truce will be broken and mark my words, it will be broken with old
lies.
Well, sorry, but you're not going to like the results. I know plenty
more and that is just using a bit of knowledge as a resource. I have
plenty more to work with.
Worse yet, when I focus on a person, I know them. I used that to get
Frank to send that email to you which I knew you would post. I knew you
wouldn't take it, but I had to give you a warning.
Further, the result of knowing most people is what was already
happening with you. You bore me and while knowing you makes me feel
sorry for you, I have no interest in you.
So now what?
Nothing. I just don't care about you. I might respond to you at some
point, but it certainly seems a waste.
***********************************************************************
By the way, you keep complaining that I don't post about gear and diving
techniques. I suppose I should respond to satisfy your curiosity.
You know I have posted dive tips, because you blasted them before you
apologised. Still, there are somewhere over 400 pages about diving on
my site and there is almost no mention of gear or dive travel. It's about
what happens in the water and therein are many comments about hazards,
methods of diving and extensive details about hunting techniques, but
really, the title is 'Diving for the Fun of It' and that is what it is
about. I consider gear almost as unimportant as you consider it
important. Heck, I never even discuss spearguns. I try to convey the
excitement and beauty of diving. So why don't you ever post about an
actual dive, instead of the gear for it and how bad the PADI
instructors are? Well, different things are important to you than
are important to me. That's OK with me. How about you?
****
One final thought for you. You ask a question. The answer is within
your reach. Just look and you can figure it out. (This is where I may
be making a mistake, but I always believe the best of people.)
Enjoy, seahunt