diver.net

Re: Poor film processing





[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ California Scuba Diving BBS ] [ FAQ ]

Posted by Chuck Tribolet on August 15, 2005 at 22:31:14:

In Reply to: Poor film processing posted by Elaine on August 15, 2005 at 19:14:35:

I'd guess processing rather than film, assuming the film hasn't
been mistreated (left in the glove box on a 104F day or somesuch).

The Kodak and Fuji have pretty strict quality control on the their
film, and the bad stuff doesn't get out the door. That can't be
said for labs. I used to use a large lab, and they did pretty good
except the every once in a while there would be a couple of frames
with a couple of clear blue spots. Then they had a rash of
being unable to follow my "do not cut, do not mount" instructions,
so I switched. Never had a blue spot again. The lab I switched
to did screw up and start cutting and mounting a roll ONCE. I got a
phone call and they asked if the could dupe it onto a a single
roll. (No problem, I just find it easier to handle a strip of
36 than 36 individual slides). They got my long term loyalty.

Look for a lab that's a Kodak Q-Lab or Fuji's equivalent
(Pro-something I think).

Chuck



Follow Ups:


Name:
E-Mail:
Subject:
Message:
Optional Link URL:
Optional Link Title:
Optional Image URL:
Post Background Color: White     Black
Post Area Page Width: Normal   Full
You must type in the
scrambled text key to
the right.
This is required to
help prevent spam bots
from flooding this BBS.		 capcha
Text Key:

      


diver.net