|Letter to Governor Shwarzenegger on Possible Resumption of Abalone Fishery|
Posted by Dr. Bill on December 23, 2005 at 23:31:09:|
In Reply to: Abalone Fishery Off Southland May Reopen posted by Jon on December 23, 2005 at 14:04:56:
I wrote the following to California's Gov. Schwarzenegger about the proposed resumption of a commercial abalone fishery at San Miguel Island. I hope others will do likewise if they agree.
I am taking the time to write to you because I believe you have a sincere concern for the environment of our State.
Today I read in the [I]Los Angeles Times [/I]of the Fish & Game Commission's decision to consider re-opening a commercial abalone fishery around San Miguel Island. I am appalled at this decision which runs contrary to the recommendations by the staff biologists at the Department of Fish & Game (DFG).
If the [I]Times[/I] is correct in stating that Commissioner Jim Kellogg said he would take the word of any fisherman who earns his living by fishing "over all the science in the world," I feel Mr. Kellogg is entirely biased and unqualified to render any fact-based decisions as a Commissioner. I request that you appoint someone else with more objectivity to fill his seat.
I have been a marine biologist and SCUBA diver working in the State since the late 1960's. I remember the days when I could watch abalone grow for several years before I harvested them for dinner. Those days are long gone due to the over fishing by the commercial abalone industry (as well as recreational divers and disease), and poor former (and self acknowledged) management of these species by DFG.
Now, when the populations at San Miguel Island are beginning to show some recovery is NOT the time to resume a commercial harvest, especially to serve only the wealthy who can afford to buy such rare delicacies.
Abalone require many years to grow to legal size, and to reproductive maturity. As broadcast spawners, they require fairly high densities for successful reproduction. To thin them out now as they are initiating a comeback is absurd.
The San Miguel Island population may well serve as one of the few refuges for red abalone in the southern part of the State. As such, their health may be critical to replenishing the other Channel Islands and mainland abalone populations. To deplete them now, even by small amounts, may prove to be a serious mistake.
I personally know several former commercial abalone divers who think resuming a harvest is a major mistake. Please give us your leadership in reconsidering this ill-advised decision by a Commission on which some members sit who are unwilling to listen to facts.
Dr. William W. Bushing
|Optional Link URL:|
|Optional Link Title:|
|Optional Image URL:|
|Post Background Color:||White Black|
|Post Area Page Width:||Normal Full|
|You must type in the
scrambled text key to
This is required to
help prevent spam bots
from flooding this BBS.