diver.net

Re: Science Advisory Team guidelines


Great Dive Trips at Bargain Prices with the Sea Divers


[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ California Scuba Diving BBS ] [ FAQ ]

Posted by Diver Z on November 18, 2009 at 10:06:56:

In Reply to: Re: Science Advisory Team guidelines posted by Steve Benavides on November 18, 2009 at 08:58:30:

Thanks for the response -- but that didn't really answer the question.

Obviously, the more closures you have the more protection you'll have. What I'm trying to get at is what drove the specific levels set in the guidelines. Is there something synergistic that occurs at that level of protection? Does that represent a point where the benefit for the given level of protection accelerates? If the state goes with lesser protection, is there a non-linear (i.e. steep) dropoff in benefit below that point?




Follow Ups:


Name:
E-Mail:
Subject:
Message:
Optional Link URL:
Optional Link Title:
Optional Image URL:
Post Background Color: White     Black
Post Area Page Width: Normal   Full
You must type in the
scrambled text key to
the right.
This is required to
help prevent spam bots
from flooding this BBS.
capcha
Text Key:

      


diver.net