|Re: Science Advisory Team guidelines|
Posted by Diver Z on November 18, 2009 at 10:06:56:|
In Reply to: Re: Science Advisory Team guidelines posted by Steve Benavides on November 18, 2009 at 08:58:30:
Thanks for the response -- but that didn't really answer the question.
Obviously, the more closures you have the more protection you'll have. What I'm trying to get at is what drove the specific levels set in the guidelines. Is there something synergistic that occurs at that level of protection? Does that represent a point where the benefit for the given level of protection accelerates? If the state goes with lesser protection, is there a non-linear (i.e. steep) dropoff in benefit below that point?
|Optional Link URL:|
|Optional Link Title:|
|Optional Image URL:|
|Post Background Color:||White Black|
|Post Area Page Width:||Normal Full|
|You must type in the
scrambled text key to
This is required to
help prevent spam bots
from flooding this BBS.