... or how I re-wrote my notes
Humans certainly seem to have instincts to have sex. They also
have instincts to nurture and care for children. On the other hand,
it's not at all clear that they have instincts to have children. That
just seems to come naturally from the instinct to have sex.
The point is that birth control is a moral issue because it
acts to interfere with the result of an important instinct, having sex,
that has been important to human survival. At the same time, historically,
humans have commonly had an over population problem. It has been dealt
with before. The Greeks widely practiced homosexuality and then had families
later in life. This was a fairly successful method. Hopefully that doesn't
make you too morally queasy because the far more common method of birth
control was warfare. This was true of Asia, Europe, North America, Africa, the Middle
East and Mezo-America. The Yucatan peninsula is a great example of this because
the soil is poor and the porous limestone ground absorbs all surface water.
This greatly limited agriculture, but they still managed to build agriculturally
based civilizations. Famine was common. Warfare became constant to the point of
being ritualized. Morally no group can kill their own, but they can kill
the "others" and the "others" kill them in turn. Then again, some civilizations
sent the excess population into slavery. This is just the way most humans in
history have dealt with over-population.
|