... or how I re-wrote my notes

It is a great accomplishment for me to reach this point in my writing. What goes before this is basically composed of what qualifies as science and is written in a disciplined manner so that it is valid in terms of biological science. There is very little speculation or even attempt at much original knowledge. It was written to make a strong foundation for this part, which is meant to be hypothesis built upon that foundation. That foundation of science is also meant to be enough to validate what follows here. Here I can speculate and make descriptions that are not yet accepted as science (and in some cases may never be), but are based on what is understood or at lease well accepted. In any case, it is best to keep speculation to a minimum, but it is disciplined speculation that advances knowledge and it is with these essays that I plan to organize what can be a formal study of Morality. It is descriptions, evaluations and organization of factors effecting human survival.
Most sciences are primarily about natural phenomena. The science of Morality is different because it is created with an objective beyond just a description of what exists. It is specifically created with an objective in mind and a recognized bias, survival. It makes descriptive observations of survival methods, but it also makes evaluations of what is observed in terms of what appears to effect survival. It is to provide the tools needed for human survival into the future. That puts a speculative component, a subjective component and an evaluation of the descriptive observation that is not always as present in other sciences. Well, here are some observations and speculations.

While this is a fairly free style examination, each topic is examined in terms of what seems most relevant including survival, organization, cooperation, status and various other important aspects of human strategies.

In all cases, this is supposed to observe and describe parts of human morality. In many cases, this information, put in the context of this entire study, is used to describe moral methods that work to promote survival. There is usually more than one method and each is usually part of a complete system. Sometimes the parts are interchangeable and sometimes not.
More than just to list moral issues, this part includes judgements applied to the different parts, based on what I have learned through this whole project.
Moral laws must be systems that humans can not only use to survive, but also that they can understand and follow.

That was written about 2 years ago. In that time, I listed (below) all of what I know are the factors that will determine human survival. That was science. Now is the time for judgement.

Geneticc

Back To Home Page