Posted by seahunt on July 23, 2001 at 20:05:49:
I didn't need a search engine. These are just since Wednesday.
If you want the old ones, I've got plenty more URLs for you.
Just to help you out, I've moved the post up here for you.
See. Look at the dates... I'm sure you appreciate it.
Now are those lies or what? Lets see. I count 5.
*
I've posted advice, but actually I like to put most of my posts
on my site. Read it. There's lots there. You might learn something.
Heck, besides which. last time I posted some tips, you went
ballistic. Now didn't you... then you apologised. Good man. I'm
glad you recognized them for the valuable information they were.
*
My cosmology posts are about the websites, which are mostly about
diving foreign to CA. Over time, I have learned more about DIR and
and come to see it has good points, though there are things I think
are dumb. You, not anyone else, I think are a ... well, you can
fill that in yourself.
*
So what about those lies down there? Where did I post what you claim?
>No more excuses, no more misdirection.. Put it up or shut the hell up...
Hey, use the search engine.
*
I'll post when I want to. You wouldn't like it if I didn't take the
time to do it carefully. as I also said, it's not going to be short.
Heck, diving is too fun to be short changed. I'm sure you agree.
Enjoy the diving, seahunt
>I've been trying to keep things civil
Whoops, Lie number 6.
*
*
**********************************************************************
For you Michael
**********************************************************************
Dishonest posts from this past week
Posted by seahunt on July 23, 2001 at 06:43:09:
*
In another post from yesterday.....
*****
Re: Explanation of *on the fly computing* - LONG
Posted by MHK on July 19, 2001 at 17:24:00:
In Reply to: Re: Explanation of *on the fly computing* - LONG posted by SLANG on July 19, 2001 at 17:08:51:
....... diver's and why was Seahunt screaming so loudly that it can't be done????
*****
While this is not literally dishonest, maybe he should have mentioned that I haven't questioned anything about his deco methods since the Demo (what, 5 months ago)....except to confirm that he had a method that was based on depth averaging and to ask how he does the averging.
Actually, looking at the first recent post on the deco topic (whick I still say was just posted to generate publicity for the weekends demo), I notice that in the starting post of the thread, there is this...
****
NDL limits without using a computer...
Posted by MHK on July 18, 2001 at 13:39:53:
Seahunt has, once again, introduced the theory that we have failed to adequately explained to address the issue. Despite numerous posts, countless explanations he doesn't get it.. I'll try one more time to demonstrate how VERY easily this can be done..
****
That's definately dishonest. I did not 'once again' say anything about DIR deco methods. I didn't say anything about them. That was posted out of the blue to generate controversy. There is nothing about deco from me preceeding this post. You mention instigation.
*
In a post from the day before that...
****
Re: No No No....
Posted by MHK on July 18, 2001 at 11:43:20:
In Reply to: Re: No No No.... posted by seahunt on July 18, 2001 at 11:33:48:
BTW, Will we see you this weekend at Casino Point and maybe you can
tell Irvine exactly why DIR doesn't apply out here, how we can't dive
without computers, why the helicopter gyro thing is better and so
forth...
****
I never said DIR does not apply out here.
I never said that anyone can't dive without computers.
As I have made clear before by showing the original post, his favorite statements about 'the helicopter gyro thing' is a complete willful mis-representation of what I said (also partly made up)... and he does love to repeat it, doesn't he.
The original post is at http://diver.net/bbs/messages/11822.shtml:
*
If these aren't lies, I'd like to know how.
seahunt