Re: Wet Steel issue response to Chuck


Great Dive Trips at Bargain Prices with the Sea Divers

[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ California Scuba Diving BBS ] [ FAQ ]

Posted by seldom seen slim on September 06, 2002 at 21:48:38:

In Reply to: Re: Wet Steel issue response to Chuck posted by Chuck Tribolet on September 06, 2002 at 19:38:26:

Your post was clearly written and understood.
I found Kendall's post too convoluted, ("…AL/AA issue in recreational set-ups often miss the fact that it's context specific. Ditchable v. nonditchable weight is that context and it's not black and white.") However, I appreciate his effort. I would offer that his point at the end "Really, calling this issue a steel v, aluminum issue is inaccurate. It's a
ditchable v. non ditchable issue" should have been at the beginning.

I also find that it is annoying to have a floating tank on my back "An empty AL80 is +4 pounds in salt water." A tank that rests on the torso - "An empty HP80 is -1 pounds in salt water", is better to deal with.
In other words, I would rather have a small amount weight on my back than an size hook pulling me up.

Lastly, swimming up 10-15 lbs of bugs, weights, anchors, etc. from 120 ft is not death defying or difficult. It reads worse in print until you actually do it.

Fear sells but experience tells.



Follow Ups:



Post a Followup

Name:
E-Mail:

Subject:

Comments:


[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ California Scuba Diving BBS ] [ FAQ ]