Posted by seahunt on June 01, 2001 at 14:04:39:
In Reply to: I'll accept your challenge posted by MHK on June 01, 2001 at 09:47:29:
>I'll accept your challenge
>I just had the time to actually read all your post ( seriously,
>have you ever considered shortening the length of your psosts) and
>I will be happy to do the following:
Well, it's nice that you took note of one paragraph that I wrote,
but I'd really like you to answer the long rest of the post and
explain why you think it OK to act like a jerk on the internet, in
a way that you wouldn't consider acting in person. Is it because
you figure it's safe?
>You offered it up so now don't back out.
You mean like you did on your explanation of DIR deco methods?
>I would love for you to list your reasons for why you dive
>overweighted,
Michael, I'm trying to avoid name calling, but if you can't catch
up with what I have repeatedly said about that issue, maybe you
really are STUPID. I never said I was overweighted. You did. I
repeat for the umphteenth time, I am not overweighted.
Haven't you ever noticed that you frequently say things that never
happened (like that I advised a newbie to dive the Moody), then
after you are corrected, you still never get it right and just keep
on repeating your error? Another fair example of that is:
>If you remember I even offered to pay for you on a
>two day trip to compare our systems of diving
No, you were going to demonstrate your deco method and that's just
how you tried to weasel out of your original promise to describe it.
Maybe you have a real memory problem instead of just a BS problem.
Do you want the posts to remind you?
And another example of that is:
>would love for you to explain the lack of a need for fundamental
>deco theory and blind reliance of devices...
Now that's some interesting verbal gymnastics. Please show me where
I said that. Correct me if I'm wrong. Actually, it was you, as a DIR
position, that said that 'divers should not use dive computers' and
that's one of the silliest (to be charitable) things you've come up
with.
It seems clear that you get far less correct than wrong.
Kelphead said you have have a problem with basic reading comprehension.
It goes way farther than that. You're wacked. With your accuracy rate
here, I'd hate to have you as my accountant.
Well, I'll write something up for you, but I'm not holding my breath
for an intelligent response, but if nothing else, I'm an optimist so
we'll give it another shot and see if you can figure out what I write
this time.
seahunt