Re: No No No....

[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ California Scuba Diving BBS ] [ FAQ ]

Posted by seahunt on July 18, 2001 at 11:33:48:

In Reply to: Re: No No No.... posted by MHK on July 18, 2001 at 09:43:38:

Until then, I suggest that you concentrate your efforts on a system that allows for maximun
flexibility and that doesn't need to be changed from one environment to another.. I can't for
the life of me understand why you have such a hard time with that very simple premise..

Great question.
Because in the real world, specialization of function is
the rule. This is true in both biological and engineering
systems. You try to shoehorn DIR procedures into all cases
and it looks like a very funny fit. It also accounts for
the huge discrepencies of detail that arise when you
describe some DIR precepts.
Just think about your comment about the demo above. You
have to explain that since GI etc. will be there, no it
will still be rec, not cave/wreck. Funny, you have to
clarify that point. Obviously most people think of
cave/wreck when they think of DIR.... As they

As for my little essay on diving procedures, I think
you're going to see what I'm playing with sooner than
you want. Still, I like ideas to stew a bit until
cooked properly. I'm not much into sound bites and
I'm certainly not going to hurry on your account.
Enjoy, seahunt

Follow Ups:

Post a Followup




[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ California Scuba Diving BBS ] [ FAQ ]