Posted by Chris on April 30, 2002 at 22:23:57:
In Reply to: Its not "protected" speech when it...(+) posted by Perry Cerro Gordo on April 30, 2002 at 21:22:48:
I see nothing about what diverlink.com posted that "willfully damages or otherwise hinders ability to conduct business."
Just what did they say that was not true that hindered PADI's ability to do business.
I see nothing of the sort there.
I read PADI's ludicrous lawsuit, and I read the diverlink.com article they sued over.
Don't tell me there are many examples in google, show me a link or point out specific cases.
Post a Followup